Washington Potato & Onion Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
910595381
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Pasco, WA, US
Phone
509.727.3256
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,047
Expenses
$105,071
Assets
$253,416
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIKA PINK-ZIMMER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DANIKA PINK-ZIMMER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • BRENDEN KENT (CHAIR (THRU 06/2024)/TRUSTEE)
  • ANN VANDYKE (TRUSTEE/CHAIR (AS OF 06/2024))

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promoting the sale of Washington grown potatoes and onions

The Washington Potato & Onion Association (WPOA) is the only association in Washington State that represents potato and onion shippers. It serves as a resource for packing sheds, providing tools, resources, workshops, political action, and networking events to help them succeed in agriculture. WPOA is involved in labor issues, international trade, and legislative advocacy on behalf of its members, and hosts an annual summer convention with guest speakers on topics impacting the industry.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.2%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -26.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.41; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 39.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 1.2% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.