Washington Osteopathic Medical Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
916037851
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Gig Harbor, WA, USA
Phone
4256773930
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$182,597
Expenses
$241,686
Assets
$35,767
Liabilities
$61,368

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROSEANNE ANDERSEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MARK BALDWIN (PRESIDENT)
  • MONICA HAINES (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SCOTT FANNIN (PAST PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROSEANNE ANDERSEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $84,556 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Washington osteopathic medical association (woma) promotes public health and the art and science of osteopathic medicine.

What it reported doing in 2024

Communication & assistance: updates entitled "news you can use" were provided on an as-needed basis, providing information on continuing medical education programs, state agency information, rules and regulations affecting the practice of osteopathic medicine and practice-related topics and were emailed to members and non-members and posted this information on the woma website. Forwarded emails containing information from the department of health and board of osteopathic medicine and surgery to members and non-members in Washington state. Continued to update the website to a more comprehensive and user-friendly site for member and non-member physicians, students, patients, and the general public.maintained a list of dos willing to shadow/interview pre-med students. Assisted several patients by phone seeking a referral to an osteopathic physician. Maintained an on-line referral director, "find a do". Met with and presented the unique practice and history of osteopathic medicine in Washington state to medical students at pnwu.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -32.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.72; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 35%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $85K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.