Washington Future Problem Solving
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911728780
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Bothell, WA, USA
- Phone
- 9703109070
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $137,525
- Expenses
- $126,334
- Assets
- $67,797
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KARI BEYER (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- MICHELLE GORDON (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MATTHEW BOHANNAN (AFFILIATE DIRECTOR)
- ANN FOREYT (EVALUATION DIRECTOR)
- HINA GOLANI (TREASURER/BOOKKEEPER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educational. To motivate and assist participants to develop and use creative thinking skills, learn about complex issues that will shape the future, develop an active interest in the future, develop and use written and verbal communication skills, learn and utilize problem solving strategies, develop snf udr teamwork skills, develop and use research skills, and develop and use critical and analytical thinking skills.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization serves approximately 2,000 people in Washington state by organizing and staffing numerous tournaments where school children are involved in positive, creative, and analytical teamwork activities. This activity is made possible by fees paid by the school districts and parents, and many volunteer hours. Ending the year with a state bowl where approximately 400 students and 50 adults attend this three-day event where students compete.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.9%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 95.7%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.9% of revenue deployed · 95.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $121K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.