Washington Federal Triangles Soccer Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541863780
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2026152741
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $52,731
- Expenses
- $51,437
- Assets
- $59,502
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michael Budros (President)
- Gar Meng Leong (Vice President)
- Keyla Tumas (Immediate Past President)
People named in this filing
- Michael Budros (President)
- Gar Meng Leong (Vice President)
- Andrew Scalise (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote the growth and play of soccer in the LGBT community in the Washington DC Metropolitan Area and foster a sense of community for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual players, spectators, officials, volunteers, supporters, and our friendly allies.
What it reported doing in 2025
Create an inclusive environment for members and provide opportunities for members to engage and interact with one another through soccer and other forms of engagement. We keep members engaged through frequent communications, monthly pickup soccer nights (Friday Night Lights), the annual Turkey Bowl soccer tournament and Thanksgiving potluck, our annual meeting and award ceremony, and more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.8%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 89%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.16; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.8% of revenue deployed · 89% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $46K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.