Washington Community College Admin C/o Columbia Basin College
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911207764
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2009, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Pasco, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5095424813
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $139,483
- Expenses
- $118,504
- Assets
- $147,622
- Liabilities
- $34,296
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DENISE YOCHUM (PRESIDENT)
- BOB KNIGHT (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- KATI HAYS (EXEC DIR)
- DENISE YOCHUM (PRESIDENT)
- BOB KNIGHT (PRESIDENT EL)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide professional development opportunities for administrators and staff of community colleges in Washington state.
What it reported doing in 2013
The association provided professional development activities, scholarships, and awards to over 30 community and technical colleges in Washington state with over 350 individual employees benefiting from the programs provided.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 4
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 7.5%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 22.8% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 7.5% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.