Washington Coast Sustainable Salmon Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462155218
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Aberdeen, WA, USA
Phone
3605329113
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Wildlife Preservation, Protection

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$897,236
Expenses
$854,854
Assets
$596,515
Liabilities
$433,838

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • MARA ZIMMERMAN (EXECUTIVE DI): $119,915 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The foundation board is comprised of members with diverse backgrounds and expertise who devote their shared commitment and passion to collectively support protection and restoration of the Washington coast region salmon by providing resources and helping guide ecosystem and science-based, community-informed approaches. The board supports the highest priority needs of the coast salmon partnership with an emphasis on outcomes that are resistent to long-term change. The foundation secures diverse public and private funds to empower the partnership's durable salmon recovery outcomes in watersheds throughout the Washington coast region.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Washington coast sustainable salmon foundation (foundation) is the sister organization and fiscal sponsor of the Washington coast sustainable salmon partnership (partnership). Together, the two organizations work to protect and restore pacific salmon populations in the Washington coast region, which comprises all watersheds that drain directly into the pacific ocean between cape flattery and cape disappointment (3.75 million acres). This work is guided by the Washington coast sustainable salmon plan (salmon plan). The foundation is responsible for financial management, contracting, fundraising, and outreach needed for the partnership to successfully implement the salmon plan. Foundation staff support both plan implementation and financial, fundraising, and outreach activities. Salmon plan implementation: implementation of the salmon plan includes coordinating with local watershed groups on the strategic development and prioritization of habitat restoration projects, which are then proposed for funding through eligible funding sources. Each year, an average of 1.7 million on-the-ground habitat restoration and protection projects are implemented in the region through grants from Washington state's salmon recovery funding board. In addition, the foundation has played a pivotal role in securing an additional 12 million in habitat project funding from the state capital budget through the Washington coast restoration and resiliency initiative. This effort has involved a broad coalition of local, state, and nonprofit organization representatives who work together to restore coast ecosystems thereby benefiting coastal communities that depend on them. The foundation continually pursues additional funding opportunities to support implementation of the salmon plan. In the past four years, this has included more than 1.4 million in government and private funding sources to support the coldwater connection campaign. This campaign will accelerate restoration work with the goal of 50 projects in 10 years to re-connect 40% of the cold-water salmon and steelhead streams that are blocked by outdated culverts and other "mini-dams" on rivers of the olympic peninsula. Communication and outreach: a communications and outreach strategy was developed in 2016 to elevate public awareness of the salmon plan. The foundation is implementing this strategy with its strong salmon future campaign which was launched in 2022. Activities include project signage, field tours for elected officials, and local business outreach. Public speaking activities include presentations at regional and national conferences and in-person discussion with community groups. Activities also leverage media platforms including a website, an e-newsletter, social media, and guest features in regional newspapers and partner newsletters. The purpose of these activities is to communicate how the work of the coast salmon partnership contributes to the ecological and economic resiliency of the Washington coast region. Esa-listed salmon species: the Washington coast region is the only salmon recovery region within Washington state that is not dominated by salmon species listed as threatened or endangered under the endangered species act(esa). However, lake ozette sockeye salmon and bull trout are listed as threatened under esa. As the regional salmon recovery organization, the partnership works with national oceanic and atmospheric administration as well as state agencies and tribal governments on the implementation of the lake ozette sockeye recovery plan and with the us fish and wildlife service on the implementation of the bull trout recovery plan. Two additional species in the wahsington coast region are currently under consideration for listing under the endangered species act - olympic peninsula steelhead and Washington coast spring chinook.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.4%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $100.05 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.73; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.4% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $764K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $120K · 16 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $440K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.