Washington Association for Infant Mental Health
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731647375
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2066171951
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $110,308
- Expenses
- $24,124
- Assets
- $91,650
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Washington association for infant mental health is a vital community of interdisciplinary professionals coming together on behalf of all of Washington's youngest children and those who care for them. Wa-aimh promotes the healthy development for infants, toddlers and young children. We achieve this aim through nurturing relationships at all levels: child to caregiver, caregiver to professional, and among professional colleagues.
What it reported doing in 2012
Membership development: the organization has approximately 70 members who represent different disciplines related to infant mental health. Our programs included four membership meetings during the year, in september 2012, november 2012, january 2013 and march 2013. Each meeting was attended by 15-30 members and included a presentation by a professional in the field. Topics covered included: applying mindfulness in critical clinical moments; case study from circle of security parenting training program; format, funding, cost benefit and effects on practice of reflective consultation groups; and how to infuse infant mental health promoting first relationships into medical practices.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 14
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.1%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: 27.6%; rating input score 28
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 78.1%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.8; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.1% of revenue deployed · 27.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 28/100.