Washington Alliance for Better Schools
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911698851
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Shoreline, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2063934918
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and Grantmaking Foundations N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,918,155
- Expenses
- $3,569,400
- Assets
- $1,795,274
- Liabilities
- $418,229
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EMILY YIM (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- EMILY YIM (PRESIDENT & CEO): $258,593 total reported compensation
- JOHN BONNER (VP OF STRAGIC PARTNERSHIPS & PROGRAMS): $162,151 total reported compensation
- APRIL NILSEN (VP OF DEVELOPMENT & IMPACT): $141,591 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Washington alliance for better schools is a 501(c)(3) non-for-profit organization established in 1995. We lead a partnership of school districts, industry, and community dedicated to ensuring students furthest from opportunity can pursue a future that embraces their strengths, passions, and dreams. Washington alliance for better schools is the recipient of educationally-based state, federal and private grants which provide funding for the implementation, evaluation and reporting of each grant received.
What it reported doing in 2024
Teach2connect educator program is a six month long educator professional development program that brings together employer mentors and educators to strengthen student learning experiences through authentic and relevant workplace connections. Partnering teachers with industry mentors ensure that content brought to the classroom is relevant to real-world careers and enhances student knowledge of career pathways. Teachers visit their industry mentors' work-site and engage in conversations and activities over the course of the program to learn about industry needs, trends, challenges and career pathway information that they bring back into the classroom to share with their students. Educators take their classroom on a field trip to an industry employer to help students better understand the relevance of classroom learning to the world of work. Throughout the program, teachers integrate career connected learning (ccl) into interactions with students and course curricula while ensuring inclusive, equity-centered design and implementation.the natural leaders program is a family-centered, family-led empowerment program working with underserved families, with a focus on bipoc, immigrant, and refugee parents and families. Using an asset-based model, wabs helps families identify and cultivate the skills necessary to help overcome the language, cultural, and systemic barriers that impact student success. The program fosters school system expertise, future-oriented planning, and family leadership skills. This program began in 2003 from the understanding that immigrant and refugee parents face vast language and cultural barriers that complicate equitable family engagement critical to the success of students, and often feel even more like outsiders than other parent groups.stem4good (formerly after-school stem academy) is an after-school program for elementary school students in grades 3-5. This 4-week program empowers students to imagine a future in local stem careers and pathways through playful, real-world problem solving. The program utilizes a wabs-designed curriculum, which infuses local industry-inspired career connected learning into each unit, while aligning with national science standards and social and emotional learning goals. Stem4good is facilitated by trained industry volunteers who also share their career journey as a way to inspire students. Stem4good also has a component focused on middle school students (formerly called build cool stuff). By exploring student-generated problems, each group meets after school to engage with stem educators and volunteers in the engineering design process. As part of a 6-week session, these experiences provide greater access to career-connected learning for bipoc (black, indigenous, and people of color) and underserved middle school students. In doing so, we will strengthen the diversity of our regional workforce by engaging young learners from underrepresented groups in stem fields.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 14
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.2%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.5%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.2% of revenue deployed · 77.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $259K · 28 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.