Wasatch Trails Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453030370
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Heber, UT, USA
- Phone
- 4356405857
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Environmental Beautification and Aesthetics
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $376,755
- Expenses
- $211,104
- Assets
- $266,802
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT HOUSE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MATT CHIPMAN (DIRECTOR)
- SCOTT HOUSE (PRESIDENT)
- BEN JONES (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the wasatch trails alliance is to support and help plan a comprehensive and sustainable trail system in wasatch county, to provide outdoor recreation opportunities for locals and visitors and to meet the growing needs of the biking, hiking and equestrian communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Eric stritter, trail crew foreman, justin pyper, jonah jibson and galen carter have put in over 1500 hours of work into maintaining our beautiful trails. Not only have they resurrected 1000 turns and given the pine canyon creek complex hiking area some much needed attention, they have worked tirelessly to bring the "pull factor" pirate trail up to standard (not to mention made it way more fun) and aided in getting it adopted into the wasatch mountain state park as a real trail. In addition, the crew has cleared over 60 miles, taken down 50 or more trees, and built roughly 20 features. We are extremely grateful to mtf for supporting wtf and the wasatch back trail crew. Creative trails has finished tug of war and heard it both ways (although this trail is directional). This will be the connection point from the deer valley east development to the wow trail, roughly one mile below the boulder basin trailhead. Bob radke and crew have already started this connection and hope to finish it just in time for us to ride it before the snow we're grateful for all of the support we've had to make this happen. Partners including, Utah ex development, mag, Utah open lands, mida, and more, are how we were able to secure the uorg tier 1 grant to help fund this connection. Currently nicknamed "wowza" (although there are many trails that are a part of this project), the bonanza to wow connection is our major win for this summer the wasatch trails foundation has held the grants for this connection for many years and has endured many challenges. We are thrilled to announce that work on this amazing connection is well on its way partnering with the mountain trails foundation, this will be an epic connection from the newly finished bonanza loop trail to the high point on the wow trail, near the leaning tree. We anticipate this small collection of trails, including a downhill only bike trail, a multiuse/climb trail, and a hiking spur that brings you back to the boulder basin trailhead at the top of wow, will be finished next summer, 2025. (original grant was written in 2021).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 68% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.4%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 98.8%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 44%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.26; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.4% of revenue deployed · 98.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $209K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.