Warwick Heights Tennis Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
050437937
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
East Greenwich, RI, USA
Phone
4012258427
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Recreational l Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$86,598
Expenses
$67,703
Assets
$83,318
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN HART (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRIAN HART (PRESIDENT)
  • MAYRA DEFUSCO (DIRECTOR)
  • DEB POIRIER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Warwick heights tennis club's overall mission is to provide an enjoyable, private, safe and serene setting to its members in which they can learn and play the sport of tennis. We are a social club for all individuals who share the passion and enthusiasm for the sport of tennis. The club offers consistent opportunities for its members to participate both recreationally and competitively while bonding over their mutual interest in the sport. Access to all club facilities is restricted to members and their guests, providing them with a private and serene setting in which to gather.

What it reported doing in 2025

Annual warwick heights tennis tournament - the annual tournament runs from july to september with approximately 50 members participating in all levels and in different events. Such events include men's & women's doubles, mixed doubles and men's & women's singles.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.8%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.