Warwick Columbus Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 050279144
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Warwick, RI, USA
- Phone
- 4017379887
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $-12,560
- Expenses
- $17,077
- Assets
- $109,541
- Liabilities
- $1,912
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL BROMAGE (PRESIDENT)
- JOSEPH FOX (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL BROMAGE (PRESIDENT): $4,325 total reported compensation
- JAMES MEIZOSO (TREASURER): $4,196 total reported compensation
- RAYMOND CONROY (TRUSTEE): $4,196 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization was established for the purpose of providing a meeting space for the members of the local knights of columbus and raising funds to support its charitable mission & to support the local community & charities through financial donations & volunteer work.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide a meeting space for the knights of columbus local #2295
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -236%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.41; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 92.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -29.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $4K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.