Wartburg
Legal name: Wartburg Home of the Evangelical Lutheran Church
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131740497
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mount Vernon, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9146990800
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,760,110
- Expenses
- $23,799,438
- Assets
- $41,407,473
- Liabilities
- $33,718,434
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID GENTNER (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID GENTNER (PRESIDENT/CEO): $612,135 total reported compensation
- JOSEPH M SESSA (CFO): $317,244 total reported compensation
- BRIDGET ZIMMERMANN (SNF ADMINISTRATOR): $220,084 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wartburg enables seniors to live life to their fullest through excellence in healthcare and housing, which nurture body, mind, and spirit. Wartburg is unlike any retirement community you have ever seen before. For over a century and a half, we have provided comprehensive care services for seniors on our Mount Vernon campus and in their homes throughout the Riverdale, Eastchester, New Rochelle, Scarsdale, Larchmont, Pelham, and Bronxville, NY areas. Our mission is to provide the affordable senior living care and assistance that your family needs, no matter what that looks like. We take a proactive approach to providing care that allows us to meet a variety of needs throughout the Westchester County, NY region. Whether you need temporary assistance or ongoing services, Wartburg has the support you need. For those interested in li.
What it reported doing in 2024
The skilled nursing program provides various levels of long-term care based on the individual's needs. It also includes short term sub-acute rehabilitation services designed for adults who are recovering from injury, surgery or disease. The skilled nursing program has serviced 532 adults providing approximately 19,798 days of care throughout 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 71.2%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -51%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.74; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.81; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 71.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $17M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $612K · 24 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.1M reported
- Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.