Warszawski Uniwrsytet Medyczny
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 980674509
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Warsaw, PL
- Phone
- 0225720370
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $163,852,752
- Expenses
- $159,745,949
- Assets
- $631,243,108
- Liabilities
- $103,440,575
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- 9168 (Officer): $124,469 total reported compensation
- 10886 (Officer): $114,714 total reported compensation
- 81286 (Officer): $109,066 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny as a public charity refers its activities to education and scientific goals. Its mission is to educate students for practising medicine, dentistry, nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy and pharmacy. The main activity is conducted at four academic faculties. Also university education activities include a range of postgraduate training: doctoral studies, specialization and postgraduate courses in numerous fields.
What it reported doing in 2024
ABM11 Assessment of the incidence of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn in a group of newborns born between 32 and 42 weeks of gestation treated with salbutamol -The primary objective of the clinical trial will be to assess the incidence of PPHN (PPHN-persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn) defined as the need for ventilation with FiO2 > 0.50 and echocardiographic signs of increased pulmonary pressure (left-right or bidirectional shunt through a patent ductus arteriosus) or the need for ventilation with FiO2 > 0.50 and a difference in pre- and post-ductal saturation > 20%) in the treatment of respiratory failure in a group of newborns born between 32 and 41 weeks of gestation. The secondary objectives will be to assess the modified Silverman scale, hereinafter referred to as the "TTN scale" in comparison to the concentration of oxygen used during ventilation and the intervention used, and to assess the parameters of the acid-base balance test: pH, carbon dioxide tension (pCO2), base deficiency (BE) in the compared groups. The study was planned as a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 71% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.7%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.95; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 50 of 50 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $159.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 31 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $8.4M reported
- Consistency: 43 of 43 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.