Warriors Walk Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
333121001
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
New Lenox, IL, USA
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$71,306
Expenses
$48,253
Assets
$23,053

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ryan Brazel (President)

People named in this filing

  • Scott Meder (Director)
  • Lawrence Paveza (Director)
  • Luis Serna (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Warriors Walk Inc. is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes to support veteran mental wellness and help prevent veteran suicide through community-based events public outreach educational initiatives and charitable fundraising activities. The organization promotes awareness camaraderie resilience and community engagement through programs such as endurance ruck marches partnerships with organizations dedicated to supporting veterans and fundraising efforts that provide financial support to nonprofit organizations that assist in preventing veteran suicide.

What it reported doing in 2025

Warriors Walk Inc. conducted community-based programs and fundraising activities throughout 2025 to raise awareness of veteran suicide and support veteran mental wellness initiatives. Activities included the organizations annual community Ruck March banquet dinner community outreach efforts merchandise sales and other fundraising events organized by volunteers and supporters in the local community. Funds raised through donations public support and partner organizations were used to support the organizations charitable and educational mission including providing financial support to nonprofit organizations dedicated to veteran mental health and suicide prevention. These programs promoted community engagement camaraderie resilience and public awareness surrounding veteran suicide prevention.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 10
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.6%; rating input score 9
  • Program expense ratio: 12.8%; rating input score 13

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32.3%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8.6% of revenue deployed · 12.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.