Warriors Center for Women Hardeman County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861509140
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Collierville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 9016107263
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing, Shelter N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $344,209
- Expenses
- $345,769
- Assets
- $16,659
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Samantha Gardner (Executive Director)
- David Vincent (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Samantha Gardner (Executive Director): $33,208 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Warriors Center for Women Hardeman is dedicated to assisting women in overcoming issues related to homelessness and/or substance abuse. We meet needs such as shelter, clothing, medical/dental assistance, rehabilitation, education & job training.
What it reported doing in 2024
Recovery & Rehabilitation Program - The objective is to help women that are homeless and/or addicted to substances by providing safe housing & spiritual support. This helps them to become productive members of society. In 2024, 50 women were housed that would have been homeless otherwise. The average stay is 180 days. The average counseling & group hours per individual is 380 hours of rehabilitation treatment. We served 22,200 meals to those in the program over the year. We helped provide healthcare for 44 women through local medical partnerships. Dental care is provided through local community dental providers. We provided clothing for 45 women and 36 women received work therapy and job training to help learn a balanced and productive life in the workforce and to build trade skills. 10 women graduated the program throughout the year. The program provided 10 opportunities for community outreach to help the local homeless communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 45
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.4%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 80%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 31.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.4% of revenue deployed · 80% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $277K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $33K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.