Warrior to Citizen Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273645634
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Norcross, GA, USA
Phone
7703565449
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$129,531
Expenses
$126,399
Assets
$208,411

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL P ROBERTS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL P ROBERTS (PRESIDENT)
  • WILLIAM T FRICKE (TREASURER)
  • DAN WHIGHAM (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To help returning soldiers and their family's transition from the front lines to the home front and deal with symptoms of post-traumatic stress. Warrior to citizen's goal is to help soldiers face a variety of social, economic and mental conflicts that may arise after they return stateside and ensure any assistance or counseling is offered before trouble turns into tragedy.

What it reported doing in 2019

Providing proactive regionalized intervention, counseling and facilitation of other services for veterans and their families that will assist in the avoidance of high-risk pursuits commonly engaged in following deployments. To reduce the dysfunctional behavior reflective of periods of high stress such as drug, alcohol and physical abuse as well as provide a "safe haven" for building relationships and bringing the veteran and family into balance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.5%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 42.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 61.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.5% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $114K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.