Warrior Creek Development Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473926581
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
WAR, WV, USA
Phone
3048754821
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5
Expenses
$3,612
Assets
$17,113
Liabilities
$607

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CRAIG SNOW (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CRAIG SNOW (PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE WYER (SECRETARY)
  • RICHARD EDDINGER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Warrior creek development, inc., a non-profit organization, is passionately dedicated to the sustainable revitalization of our communities, allowing citizens to cultivate social enterprise and perpetuate quality jobs, quality homes and quality lives in mcdowell county, West Virginia.

What it reported doing in 2021

Warrior creek development, a social enterprise located in mcdowell county, West Virginia, believes in developing the potential of appalachia by unlocking the people's own creative power to transform perceived problems into opportunities. As such, we seek to create an employment-based social enterprise designed to diversify mcdowell county's economy. By our definition, "employment-based" means an enterprise, which exists for the purpose of advancing the well being of its employees through personal development programming. Our success is measured according to a triple bottom line: people, planet, and profitability. With our quality jobs initiative that is focused on residential and commercial construction we endeavor to build a sustainable enterprise while bringing the most good for people and our planet.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -72,140%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.74; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.