Warren Rifles Chapter #934 United Daughters of the Confederacy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
621420901
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Front Royal, VA, USA
Phone
5406352219
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$47,810
Expenses
$36,185
Assets
$309,896
Liabilities
$520

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MRS SUZANNE SILEK (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • MS SUE MURRAY (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MRS PEGGY HEYDEN (TRUSTEE)
  • MRS ARNOLD M WILLIAMS JR (SECRETARY)
  • MS TAMMARA HEIRD (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Historical, eudcational, benevolent, memorial and patriotic rememberance and documentaion of the historical aspects of the civil war era.

What it reported doing in 2018

This organization's objectives are historical, educational, benevolent, memorial and patriotic. The organization operates a musuem of historical doucments and artifcats.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.3%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.56; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.