Warren Professional Building Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 730769415
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tulsa, OK, US
- Phone
- 918-481-7955
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,131,309
- Expenses
- $21,688,602
- Assets
- $146,152,198
- Liabilities
- $997,194
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- T MCNULTY (PRESIDENT)
- T COOPER (CHAIRMAN AND CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- T MCNULTY (PRESIDENT): $508,503 total reported compensation
- D WILSON (DIRECTOR OF GUEST SERVICES): $167,571 total reported compensation
- B TOLOMEO (OPERATIONS MANAGER): $153,650 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing the very best in customer service through housekeeping and maintenance services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Since 1967, warren professional building corporation ("wpbc") has helped support saint francis health system, inc. ("sfhs"). A primary purpose of wpbc is to support sfhs by holding, managing, acquiring and building ancillary real estate facilities so that sfhs can focus on health care delivery. Wpbc owns and manages buildings that serve as office and clinic space for medical professionals that serve patients in the sfhs community. These buildings are: - warren medical building - kelly medical building - william medical building - natalie medical building - warren clinic buildings 2, 7 and 11 - broken arrow medical office building - bishops medical building - coweta medical office building - warren clinic owasso - warren clinic south memorial - warren clinic broken arrow kenosha - warren clinic tulsa hills - warren clinic sand springs. Wpbc has a helpful website that has a patient/visitor section to help people locate the medical professionals they need within the buildings and where they may request assistance with access. Wpbc also provides strategic property consulting services and expertise to sfhs in evaluating and planning for future real estate needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 57
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.74; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $509K · 9 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.2M reported
- Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.