Warner Center Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
953766872
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Woodland Hills, CA, USA
Phone
8187162689
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$84,625
Expenses
$82,033
Assets
$22,505

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DAVID ALLISON (Treasurer)
  • BRAD ROSENHEIM (Secretary)
  • MICHAEL WILDING (Vice Chair)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Warner center association's function is to promote warner center as abeneficial place to own property, work and/or live. Thus, disbursements for thisendeavor aid the organization's members by providing information andservices involving land use and transportation planning, economicdevelopment and similar issues of concern to members, members employees and the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

The WCA continued its strong advocacy on behalf of Warner Center business interests, working to protect and enhance Warner Center as a vibrant live-work environment with excellent recreational opportunities by:-Promoting Warner Center as a regional hub to drive job growth and economic development.-Advocating for innovative first-mile/last-mile transportation solutions, including ongoing collaboration with LACI.-Engaging with state and local legislators and leaders through dedicated meetings to ensure the unique needs of the Warner Center community are heard and addressed.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.