Warm Project Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 010577105
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2010–2017
Forms available: Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location: Chestnut Ridge, NY, USA
Phone: 8455946944
Rating: 40
Verdict: MIXED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Federated Giving Programs

Reported finances

Revenue: $146,006
Expenses: $88,034
Assets: $179,568
Liabilities: $8,264

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

YISROEL GREENWALD (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide counseling and therapeutic care to help girls of high school age at risk due to parental dysfunction.

What it reported doing in 2017

Provided counseling and therapeutic care to help girs of high school age at risk due to parental dysfunction.

Operating model

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 0
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 80
Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: 39.7%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.04; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: -17.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 30% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2017
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.