Warbasse Nursery School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 112077918
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7182665585
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,780,509
- Expenses
- $1,784,076
- Assets
- $418,392
- Liabilities
- $228,882
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHEN JACOBY (PRESIDENT)
- JANET SCHLESINGER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LAURA GIANNINO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LAURA GIANNINO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $89,278 total reported compensation
- MARY ANNE MARMAN (CONTROLLER): $86,015 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide special education services to pre-school children with developmental disabilities.effective august 12, 2016 the organization has ceased operations.
What it reported doing in 2015
Services are provided in an integrated setting whereby disabled and non-disabled children learn together in the same classroom in an effort to enhance the learning experience of developmentally disabled children.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.6%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 72.5%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.6% of revenue deployed · 72.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $89K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.