Walts Waltz

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843226395
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Greenville, SC, USA
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health, Crisis Intervention N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$159,051
Expenses
$100,260
Assets
$149,739

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Tracy Butler (Board Chair)
  • Pamela Williams (Treasurer)
  • Julia Jetter (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mental health awareness and advocacy to end stigma.

What it reported doing in 2025

Painting Mental Health Workshops Art-based workshops in schools and community groups. Educates participants about mental health coping strategies stigma reduction and available resources. Curriculum includes myths and facts about mental health age-appropriately adapted. All participants receive a self-care kit containing 16-set watercolor paints a mirror with positive affirmations self-care tips and educational resources to support wellness strategies creative expression and positive self-talk at home. Participants are connected to national and local mental health resources including 988 crisis support upcoming Mental Health First Aid certification opportunities and other free community programs. Materials and resources are provided in English and Spanish when appropriate. Programs are inclusive and accessible.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.2%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 92.7%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.49; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 66.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 46.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 40% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.2% of revenue deployed · 92.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $93K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.