Walnut Street Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042513725
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Medford, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6177761448
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,603,687
- Expenses
- $21,097,209
- Assets
- $8,465,801
- Liabilities
- $3,915,167
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHEN PRESCOD (PRESIDENT)
- CAROLYNE GUFFEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROLYNE GUFFEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $240,080 total reported compensation
- JUAN GOMEZ (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $233,814 total reported compensation
- EVBAYOWIERU OSAGIEDE (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $186,672 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the walnut street center is to provide adults, with developmental disabilities, with opportunities to live engaged and meaningful lives. The agency accomplishes this mission by offering a variety of support services that provide opportunities to live, work, volunteer and socialize in the community. The walnut street center is currently developing and enhancing support services to meet the changing needs of the people who are served by this agency.
What it reported doing in 2024
Residential supports: walnut street center 's residential programs provide a variety of living options within the community, including individual supports (less than 24/7), and fully staffed homes (24/7). Our programs include medically intensive services, alzheimer's care, dual diagnosis, autism, dementia, and behavioral programs.24-hour support: this model provides private residences integrated within the community that are staffed 24 hours a day.these homes provide supports for multiple adults, each with their own private bedroom. Supports are customized to meet the needs of each resident.individual support: the individual support service model provides supports to adults with intellectual disabilities who live independently in their own home or apartment or with their families. The service is provided either through case management or recurrent support from walnut street center staff. Walnut street center works with the individual and their support network to develop a customized model that allows for the highest level of independence.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 81% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 93
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.3%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 88.4%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.3% of revenue deployed · 88.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $18.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $240K · 14 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.9M reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.