Walla Walla Valley Rodeo Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880529458
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Waitsburg, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5416636561
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Equestrian
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,426
- Expenses
- $63,134
- Assets
- $22,631
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CARTER BARON (PRESIDENT)
- ASHLEY LANE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- COOPER MOYER (DIRECTOR)
- JAXSON GARTNER (DIRECTOR)
- CARTER BARON (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support youth development, growth, self-esteem and showcase the local youth in the sport of rodeo by access to practice, and by building on their passion for the sport while teaching integrity and responsibilities to young people in the walla walla valley regardless of ability to pay.
What it reported doing in 2024
He rodeo club conducts two rodedos a year to provide a venue for high school and junior high students to showcase their rodeo skills and provide them throughout the year places and resources to practice. Net proceed from the rodeos provide scholorships to seniors graduating high shcool and advancing to college and travel money for those members that quality for the national rodeos and silver state rodeos.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.8%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -53% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -25.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $63K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.