Walkerford Community Center Adviso

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593155896
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Tallahassee, FL, USA
Phone
8508913970
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$24,164
Expenses
$23,783
Assets
$1,067

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The teen councils overall mission is to assure that the walker ford community center is able provide the wide range of meaningful and relevant programs necessary to meet the needs of citizens of all ages in our community.

What it reported doing in 2012

The walker-ford community center is a community center located in the urban core of tallahasse, fl where a large population of at risk children and teens are confronted with difficult challenges each and every day. The center aims to salvage these at risk children and assist them in becoming good productive citizens. Programs address drop-out prevention, teen pregnancy, healthy lifestyle choices as well as character development. The purpose is demonstrated in various activities during the year, not limited to: the walker/ford teen council is a youth organization consisting of teens ranging from 13 to 18 in age along with the pre-teen council with local youth ranging from 6 to 12 in age. Through serving in responsible positions on the council and/or participating in council activities, these teens and pre-teens learn valuable life skills and values leading to becoming outstanding citizens in the community and in society in general. Youth zumba classes are introduced to combat childhood obesity and an annual senior christmas ball was established ot encourage intero- generational harmony.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.4%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 97.9%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -38% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -37.5% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 58.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.4% of revenue deployed · 97.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.