Walker County Childrens Policy Council Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
631282688
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Jasper, AL, USA
Phone
2053020801
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$53
Expenses
$1,893
Assets
$17,865

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JUDGE HENRY ALLRED (Chairman)
  • JERRY LOVETT (CO-CHARIMAN)
  • PHILLIP WOODS (VICE CHAIRMAN)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To serve families and other agencies that serve families. Identify and help fill needs of families and children of walker county, Alabama. Serve as a community resource collaborating with and supported by a broad cross section of community organizations. The goal of the council is to provide children of walker county with the opportunity to grow up in a healthy and economically stable environment. The council consists of mandated members of state agencies and concerned citizens.

What it reported doing in 2022

Parent project - provides classes for parents of strong-willed or out-of-control adolescents. Provides classes for parents of children ages 5-10 (k-5th grade).hippy - dedicated to increasing the chances of positive early school experience among children from educationally and economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Designed to teach parents to view themselves as primary educators of their children.the organization provides services for individuals, including those referred by an Alabama municipal court and circuit and district courts. Classes for improving driving, parenting and life skills and provides help for persons in dealing with at-risk behaviors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 96%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3,471.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.44; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -24.3% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.