Walden of Trenton Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431099933
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
King City, MO, USA
Phone
6605354305
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Reported finances

Revenue
$128,863
Expenses
$137,653
Assets
$74,089
Liabilities
$134,980

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN HOLCOMB (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN HOLCOMB (PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE MAXEY (SECRETARY)
  • LINDA HARKINS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the general social welfare of the community and for the purpose to operate rental housing suited to the special needs and living requirments of elibigle occupants as determined by the usda rd regulations without regard to race, color,

What it reported doing in 2020

To promote the general social welfare of the community and for thepurpose to operate rental housing suited to the special needs andliving requirements of eligible occupants as determined by the usda rd

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.8%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.82; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -20% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $138K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2017 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.