Wakefield-brookfield Historical Society Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
026011289
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Sanbornville, NH, USA
Phone
9172099392
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$143,916
Expenses
$30,558
Assets
$375,946
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nancy Spencer Smith (President)
  • Kate Niewenhous (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Nancy Spencer Smith (President)
  • Kate Niewenhous (Vice President)
  • Jennifer Rich (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of the Wakefield Brookfield Historical Society (WBHS) is the collection, preservation, and interpretation of historic artifacts within our two communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

1. Renovation of the Cobbler Shop (foundation, exterior siding, windows, reshingled the roof, painted interior and exterior, deep cleaned interior and all of the artifacts) = $25,980 2. Purchased a historic quilt made by parish helpers from the towns of Wakefield and Brookfield, NH. Held event to showcase and share with members. Plan to photograph and display for the community. $2,400 3. Two NH Humanities speakers presented NH Schoolhouses and NH Cellar Holes at events that were well attended by both members and the community. Two grants were received by NH Humanities for a total of $600 and we paid that to the two speakers plus reimbursed them for their mileage. = $845

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 92
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 24.3%; rating input score 24
  • Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 78.8%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.3; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 24.3% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.