Waimanalo Health Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990273205
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Waimanalo, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8089547110
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,685,474
- Expenses
- $16,422,515
- Assets
- $43,427,166
- Liabilities
- $1,703,133
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CATHERINE SATO (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- JUSTIN LAM (PRESIDENT)
- RUSS AWAKUNI (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARY FRANCES ONEHA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTINA LEE (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $301,919 total reported compensation
- MARY FRANCES ONEHA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $251,461 total reported compensation
- ANTHONY KIM (DENTAL DIRECTOR): $223,958 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Waimanalo health center is committed to providing the highest level of primary and preventive health services, with special attention to the needs of native hawaiians and the medically underserved, and improving the health and wellness of individuals and their `ohana regardless of health services, with special attention to the needs of native hawaiians and the medically underserved, and improving the health and wellness of individuals and their `ohana regardless of their ability to pay.
What it reported doing in 2024
Other program services: whc hosts and supports community outreach, enabling and education programs. Programs include: women, infants, and children (wic); on-site eligibility workers to assist families with benefit programs and health insurance enrollment; family planning; nutrition and health promotions; ku i ka mana student mentoring program (kikm); keiki smiles dental outreach to the schools; cancer screening and awareness under susan g. Komen and the state breast and cervical cancer prevention programs (bcccp); outreach to prevent homelessness; and others.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 70% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and the available information about grant readiness federal audit leaves an important question unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.6%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $37.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.1%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.64; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.6% of revenue deployed · 67.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $11M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $302K · 25 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $710K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.