Wagner Community Memorial Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460226283
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Wagner, SD, USA
- Phone
- 6053843611
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,519,207
- Expenses
- $19,328,288
- Assets
- $24,383,644
- Liabilities
- $4,767,580
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID KOTAB (PRESIDENT)
- CHAD PETERS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BRYAN SLABA (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- TIANNA SMITH (CMO): $375,175 total reported compensation
- BRYAN SLABA (CEO): $343,257 total reported compensation
- JORDAN WEBER (PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT): $327,152 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wagner community memorial hospital's mission is to provide care and treatment of the sick; provide care and support of the aged, disabled, and indigent; and to provide for those in need of hospitalization regardless of race, color, creed, or ability to pay.
What it reported doing in 2024
Wcmh is a 15-bed critical access hospital equipped with extensive advanced services, including areas for medical/surgical, pediatric, swing bed, 24/7 emergency care and in-house ct. The clinic is adjacent to the hospital making it convenient to see hospital patients and share laboratory services and other diagnostic equipment. Outreach services include nephrology, orthopedics, dietitian, urology and cardiology. Wcmh provides in-house behavioral health counseling with a staff of 4 providers to include the following types of counseling: grief, family or financial stress, self-harm, life changes, traumatic events, substance abuse and depression.the facility serves as the inpatient unit for the local indian health services clinic and works collaboratively with the ihs physicians and leaders to care for the native american population. The people of the community truly believe in having access to care and supporting their local medical providers.wcmh experienced 353 inpatient days, 927 swing bed days, 2,731 emergency department visits, and 5,849 clinic visits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some related-organization disclosures are missing and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 75.8%; rating input score 76; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.26; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $375K · 14 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.8M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.