Volunteers in Psychotherapy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
061532207
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
West Hartford, CT, USA
Phone
8602335115
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$109,127
Expenses
$80,230
Assets
$271,158
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Leonard Dupille Jr PhD (President of Board)
  • Linda Scacco PhD (Vice President and Treasurer of Board)

People named in this filing

  • Richard Shulman PhD (Licensed Psychologist Director)
  • Leonard Dupille Jr PhD (President of Board)
  • Linda Scacco PhD (Vice President and Treasurer of Board)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

In 2025 VIP provided 706 therapy sessions to clients who earned them by providing ~2800 hours of independently documented volunteer work at the nonprofit, charitable or government agency of the client's choice: avoiding the lack of client control and diminished privacy of public clinics and managed care procedures.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025 VIP provided 706 therapy sessions to clients who earned them by providing roughly 2800 hours of independently documented volunteer work at the nonprofit, charitable or government agency of the client's choice: avoiding the lack of control and diminished privacy of public clinics and managed care procedures.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.7%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.5%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.38; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.9%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $80K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.