Volunteer & Exempt Firemen's Benevolent of Jericho
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237198658
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Jericho, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5164288114
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,241
- Expenses
- $122,872
- Assets
- $3,094,532
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICHARD SCHIRALDI (PRESIDENT)
- STEPHEN BALKO (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANDREW SAUSMER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RICHARD SCHIRALDI (PRESIDENT)
- STEPHEN BALKO (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANDREW SAUSMER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Aid and assistance to our indigent / disabled members
What it reported doing in 2024
Good and welfare- payments of medical and family bills - mortgage, heat, loans, etc. (based upon a committee review for need) to sick and indigent active members, inactive members or widows.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 100% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.7%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -82.7%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 25.19; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 63.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.7% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $110K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.