Voices of Truth Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464478637
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Gardner, MA, USA
Phone
9782306446
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$80,468
Expenses
$60,646
Assets
$32,624
Liabilities
$1,196

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BERNICE L RICHARD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BERNICE L RICHARD (PRESIDENT)
  • LIZ MCGUIRK (TREASURER)
  • DEBRA LYMAN (CLERK)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The voices of truth corporation is organized exclusively for charitable, religious and educational purposes. The voices of truth corporation will strive to prevent donestic violance by providing educational services and resources on the cycle and dynamics of violance. We will promote the importance of self-worth and self-empowerment through support groups and coaching. We will collaborate with individuals and other organizations to eliminate re-victimization from occurring by merging resources and creating a referral network. Voices of truth will endeavor to increasew community awareness on violence against any individual and will advocate for healthy relationship dynamics.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2018, voices of truth began the gardner domestic violence task force to finding barriers within the city regarding domestic violence. This group holds 23 members. We have developed an ebooklet about domestic violence and resources for the gardner area community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.6%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 29.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.