Voices in Contemporary Art
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 371585169
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2129982623
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $787,124
- Expenses
- $611,428
- Assets
- $729,575
- Liabilities
- $9,081
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHAD ALLIGOOD (PRESIDENT)
- KATE LEWIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LAUREN SHADFORD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LAUREN SHADFORD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $163,009 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Voca generates critical dialogue and interdisciplinary programming to address the production, presentation, and preservation of contemporary art.
What it reported doing in 2024
July 22, 2024voca research: rauschenberg year six, study day at nmailocation: national museum of the american indian, Washington dc july 29, 2024professional development workshop: interviews and your artistic legacies, nacf fellows (virtual)september 23, 2024voca research: rauschenberg year seven partnership kickoff meetinglocation: rrf offices, New York, ny (in-person)november 17, 2024voca talk: jill slosburg-ackermanlocation: cambridge, ma (in-person) november 18 - 20, 2024time-based media stewardship workshop location: institute of contemporary art/boston, boston, ma (in-person) november 20, 2025voca research: rauschenberg year seven, study day at the guggenheimlocation: the solomon r. Guggenheim museum, New York, ny (in-person)december 6, 2024voca salon: robert rauschenberg, signs & signalslocation: robert rauschenberg foundation, New York, ny (in-person)december 9, 2024voca journal, issue 14 guest edited by minerva project's founding director and voca board member yasmeen m. Siddiqui, this issue provides roadmaps and guidelines for conveying how art is made, why artists make it, and why and how we seek to preserve it. It features contributions by isabella cilia, alice evans, and haley moyse fenning, as well as megan creamer, kaelyn garcia, isaac facio, and gio swaby. December 11 - 13, 2024artist interview workshop (virtual)january 25 - 26, 2025artist interview workshop location: asian american art initiative at stanford university, palo alto, ca (in-person) january 22, 2025voca research: rauschenberg year seven partnership mid-year meetinglocation: rrf warehouse, westchester, ny (in-person)march 17-18, 2025voca research: testing sessionslocation: rrf warehouse, westchester, ny (in-person)march 24 - 26, 2025artist interview workshop: spanish-language location: museum of fine arts, houston, tx (in-person)april 17 & 18, 2025voca talks: nora naranjo morse and eliza naranjo morse (filming)location: nora and eliza's home and studios in espaola, nm (in-person)may 1, 2025voca talk: alan michelsonlocation: vera list center for art and politics at the new school, New York, ny (in-person)may 30, 2025can/voca concurrent general session at aic conferencelocation: minneapolis, mnjune 6, 2025professional development workshop: interviews and your artistic legacies location: joan mitchell foundation, New York, ny (in-person)june 14, 2025voca talk: elizabeth james-perrylocation: arrival art fair at tourists, north adams, ma (in-person)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.3%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 79.3%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.3%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.3% of revenue deployed · 79.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $485K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $163K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.