Voices for Virginia's Children

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
541726265
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Richmond, VA, USA
Phone
8046490184
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Civil Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,368,292
Expenses
$1,245,032
Assets
$1,562,427
Liabilities
$70,008

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RACHAEL DEANE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • RACHAEL DEANE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $130,457 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of voices for Virginia's children is to champion public policies and legislation that achieve positive and equitable outcomes for young people.

What it reported doing in 2024

Policy and programs: this fiscal year, voices for Virginia's children (voices) advanced its mission to champion public policies that achieve positive and equitable outcomes for young people. We re-launched Virginia's youth in action (vaya), a statewide youth policy council of 10-12 individuals ages 15-24. Whether just discovering their voice or seasoned in community engagement, young leaders in vaya have the opportunity to engage directly in public policy and advocacy.throughout the general assembly session, voices hosted three powerful advocacy days. The "our voices, our future" intergenerational advocacy day brought together advocates of all ages, backgrounds, and professions to elevate policies that center young people and those who care for them. We also had a playdate at the capitol, where we created a hands-on, family-friendly space where legislators engaged directly with children, families, and child care providers to underscore the urgent need for early childhood education investments. Lastly, we hosted a healthy school meals for all advocacy day, where we called on lawmakers to ensure every Virginia student has access to no-cost, healthy meals at school. In 2025, voices championed critical policy wins for children and families. As part of the push maternal health coalition, we supported the momnibus legislative package, securing more than $5 million in maternal health investments, including expanded medicaid coverage for doula services, midwife parity, increased postpartum doula visits, and unconscious bias training for medical professionals. Families gained greater support through the expansion of the refundable state earned income tax credit (eitc) to 20 percent of the federal credit, putting more money directly into the pockets of hardworking, low-income virginians. A package of school-based mental health bills passed this session, expanding access to telehealth in schools, requiring mental health first aid training, and increasing suicide awareness education. Our efforts supported investments in child welfare system with $500,000 for workforce retention and $425,750 to expand kinship services. Beyond Virginia, voices brought the stories of youth and families to capitol hill during our federal advocacy day in Washington, d.c. Together with community advocates, we urged Virginia's congressional delegation to oppose harmful cuts to medicaid, snap, head start, and other essential programs. Voices also continues to track federal threats to medicaid expansion in Virginia, where over 630,000 people rely on coverage that could be jeopardized by federal budget decisions. To strengthen this advocacy, we created interactive maps that demonstrate the projected harm in terms of coverage, funding, and economic development losses posed by h.r.1 to Virginia's young people and the adults and caregivers who support them.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.1%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 68.2%; rating input score 68
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.1% of revenue deployed · 68.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $849K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.