Voices for Racial Justice
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411750116
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6127464224
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Job Training
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $831,502
- Expenses
- $1,526,548
- Assets
- $2,802,492
- Liabilities
- $76,918
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHORE INGRAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MONICA BRYAND (FORMER -EXEC DIRECTOR): $154,770 total reported compensation
- SHORE INGRAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $63,462 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Voices for racial justice works to advance racial, cultural, social and economic justice in Minnesota through organizer and leadership training, policy research and strategic convening work.
What it reported doing in 2024
Racial equity policy - "our policy and research strategy consists of creating and using legislative advocacy, community based research and analysis as organizing tools. We work in collaboration with community organizers, activists, healers, artists, and multiracial coalitions, to advance racial justice in Minnesota.policy and research tools: two tools inform our policy and research strategy: (1) the racial equity impact assessment, and (2) principles for authentic community engagement. Organizing and training - "strengthening communities and movements through shared learning and training that uplifts the organizing, leadership, and visions of people working to achieve racial justice.our training and leadership development at voices for racial justice comes from a long history of investing in emerging leadership of organizers in Minnesota. We offer training in community cohorts and on a contract basis. For years our organizing training has focused on racial justice analysis, relationship-building opportunities, and practical skill-building for organizers working for racial, cultural, social, and economic justice in Minnesota. In the last couple years we have deepened our commitment to an ecological model of organizing that values the importance of many people and their differing roles in systems change and movement work. We train individuals and organizations to strengthen their tools in effecting transformative change for racial justice. Our cohort model prioritizes deep relationship building across bipoc communities using cultural and healing strategies to support leaders in building restorative organizing. Our cohorts have included: parent education equity fellowship, greater visions duluth and worthington cohorts, youth organizing institute, and statewide community organizing cohorts. " our training and leadership development at voices for racial justice comes from a long history of investing in emerging leadership of organizers in Minnesota. We offer training in community cohorts and on a contract basis. For years our organizing training has focused on racial justice analysis, relationship-building opportunities, and practical skill-building for organizers working for racial, cultural, social, and economic justice in Minnesota. In the last couple years we have deepened our commitment to an ecological model of organizing that values the importance of many people and their differing roles in systems change and movement work. We train individuals and organizations to strengthen their tools in effecting transformative change for racial justice. Our cohort model prioritizes deep relationship building across bipoc communities using cultural and healing strategies to support leaders in building restorative organizing. Our cohorts have included: parent education equity fellowship, greater visions duluth and worthington cohorts, youth organizing institute, and statewide community organizing cohorts. Prison justice - ending mass incarceration/criminal justice: we work in collaboration with people who are incarcerated and formerly incarcerated, and their families through our many cohorts to abolish mass incarceration and transform our communities.women's circle: this cohort emerged as a healing space to connect women impacted by mass incarceration to community, resources, and a space to share their stories and build resilience. In 2020-2021, we were actively involved in organizing for the healthy start act which passed, ensuring incarcerated people who are pregnant receive more humane treatment during and after birth.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 71% for direct work, and 29% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 75%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.8%; rating input score 98; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -83.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.84; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.3%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 75% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $155K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.