Voices for Children Advocacy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 432031361
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Burton, MI, USA
- Phone
- 8102383333
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Child Abuse, Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,127,761
- Expenses
- $2,404,114
- Assets
- $6,100,978
- Liabilities
- $72,985
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CD Holloman (CEO)
People named in this filing
- Jeff Collier (Treasurer)
- Angie Hendershot (Member)
- Prosecutor David Leyton (Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Voices For Children is dedicated to serving the child victim and victim families of child abuse in Genesee & Shiawassee County and enhancing the lives of all children through education and increasing community involvement.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Organization serves hundreds of Genesee & Shiawassee County children through the CASA and forensic interview programs. With our trained staff we provide a safe place to conduct child-friendly interviews bringing together a team of prosecutors, law enforcement, protective service workers, medical personnel and advocates to investigate cases. We also provide a series of prevention programs including programs to educate the community about abuse and how to recognize/prevent it.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 98%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 81.2%; rating input score 81; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.54; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 98% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 23 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 32 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D expense reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D revenue reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.