Voice of India Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932790758
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Chino Hills, CA, USA
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cultural, Ethnic Awareness

Reported finances

Revenue
$193,501
Expenses
$158,080
Assets
$40,997
Liabilities
$4,394

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KISHOR TRIVEDI (President)

People named in this filing

  • KISHOR TRIVEDI (President)
  • DARSHANA OZA (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Voice of India is dedicated to empowering women and children by providing them with the tools, guidance, and support they need to unlock their full potential. Our mission is to foster self-reliance and entrepreneurship in women who possess talent and ideas but lack the means or confidence to pursue their dreams. Through mentorship, financial support, and personalized guidance, we aim to catalyze their journey towards economic independence.In addition, Voice of India is committed to nurturing the entrepreneurial spirit in children. We organize events and initiatives that inspire and educate young minds about the possibilities of entrepreneurship, instilling in them the confidence and skills to become future leaders and innovators.At Voice of India, we believe that by empowering women and children, we are not only transforming individual lives but also building a stronger, more vibrant, and inclusive society. Together, we are creating a future where every woman and child has the opportun

What it reported doing in 2025

Aditya Gadhavi Concert-Indian Cultural concert hosted at Saban Theater in Beverly Hill, CA to promote & Inspire culture, Supported women oriented businesses by providing platform to promote and display their products, includes student participation to support the growth. Aditya Gadhavi Cultural event organized at Cerritos College to support and promote women oriented business, student exposure to cultural activity and provide platform to local businesses to promote their products

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.2%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.3%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 94.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 84.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 159.8% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.2% of revenue deployed · 83.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $132K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.