VNA Space Coast Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 651002301
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Rockledge, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7725675551
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Home Health Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,880
- Expenses
- $126,343
- Assets
- $218,102
- Liabilities
- $345,617
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lundy Fields (President/CEO)
People named in this filing
- Lundy Fields (President/CEO)
- Daniel Bach (Past CFO)
- Susan Rodgers (Chair)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide compassionate, innovative care of the highest quality for patients and caregivers needing home health services.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the year ended September 30, 2025, unpaid volunteers contributed more than 184 hours of their time in direct support of the organization. Volunteers assisted in various program areas. Based upon the hourly volunteer rate of approximately $34.88/hr. In 2025 for the state of Florida per the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the dollar value of those volunteer hours was approximately $7,000. A total of 20,900 hours of volunteer services valued at $729,000 were provided in total to the agency and its related parties. No amounts have been reflected in this return for those donated services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -695.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.73; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.58; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $126K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.