Vitreoretinal Surgery Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
412122813
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Edina, MN, USA
Phone
9522593466
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Continuing Education

Reported finances

Revenue
$347,305
Expenses
$205,103
Assets
$1,413,265
Liabilities
$108,075

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HERBERT CANTRILL MD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • HERBERT CANTRILL MD (PRESIDENT)
  • MATTHEW STARR MD (DIRECTOR)
  • CHRISTOPHER HWANG MN PHD (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The vitreoretinal surgery foundation strives to promote education and research related to retinal and macular diseases. We support research by funding awards for young investigators with a potential for a career devoted to retinal disease and research. We promote professional education by sponsoring courses designed for medical professionals including ophthalmologists, optometrists, residents, fellows, technicians and students. We promote community outreach education by raising awareness of retinal diseases, treatment options, and available resources.

What it reported doing in 2025

Since the founding of the vitreoretinal surgery foundation (vrsf) 2005, we have maintained a robust research program. The goal of the research program has been to support young investigators and encourage them to pursue a career focusing on diseases of the retina. Our research program is open to medical students, residents and fellows at ophthalmology training programs, and fulltime research trainees at academic centers. We are currently working with 36 practice based and university affiliated programs across the country.we offer two types of research grants. Our research award is designed for ophthalmology residents and fellows who want to pursue a research project during their clinical training. The award consists of a research stipend of $2000 together with an additional $1000 for research related expenses and $1000 for travel expenses to present research results at a national symposium. Our research fellowship is designed for someone involved in fulltime research at an academic institution pursuing an advanced degree, such as a phd or md/phd. The fellowship has a stipend of $10,000 and an additional $1000 for travel expenses to present research results at a national symposium.each year beginning in july we solicit applications from our 35 affiliated training programs. Applications are reviewed by our board of directors consisting of members of our professional practice, retina consultants of Minnesota pllc, as well as representatives from the university of Minnesota and the mayo clinic. The application process is competitive, with approximately half of the applications selected for an award or fellowship. In 2025, there were 74 applications, with 34 research awards given, and 5 fellowships awarded.the success of our research program can be measured by the number of presentations of research results at national meetings and publication of research manuscripts by peer reviewed journals. Research results are frequently cited in academic and professional publications. Results of presentations are sometimes picked up by local or national media. Published manuscripts are available to the academic and research community through the pubmed search engine, and most journal articles are available to members of the ophthalmology profession through open source journal access. Over the last 5 years there has been 158 presentations and 86 publications.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 77% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.7%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 92.8%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 86.6%; rating input score 87; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.89; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.7% of revenue deployed · 92.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $190K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.