Visiting Neighbors Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237379098
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2122606200
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$355,334
Expenses
$390,555
Assets
$278,997
Liabilities
$9,757

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lisa M Kail (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • CYNTHIA MAURER (Executive Dir.): $128,887 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Visiting Neighbors, Inc. a nonprofit organization, enables individuals, ages 60 Centenarian plus, to remain independent, active, as healthy and safe as possible, connected to others, and in their own cherished homes. Through programs of neighbors helping neighbors, volunteers, supported by professional staff, help older adults alleviate loneliness and isolation, provide mental stimulation and emotional security, share information about wellness & health related concerns (mental, physical and emotional) & encourage physical independence & quality of life at home, as well as encourages interdependence so that mutual learning and understanding bring generations together to share life experiences and gain respect for each persons' uniqueness. Visiting Neighbors champions the power of the volunteer, intergenerational engagement and promotes a positive acceptance of life after sixty and the value of the elderly in society. It's main programs are Health Advocacy, Health and Wellness (Physical

What it reported doing in 2024

During FY25, A record number of 875 seniors (ages 60-107) received services and 1,700 individuals received information and emotional support from Visiting Neighbors. The Organization provides seven core services as follows: Shopping and Escort Provides Shopping, Escorting and Errand Services. Volunteers provided approximately 5,500 units of service (each one-way trip). While some seniors still prefer us to go shopping for them the vast majority want to go with their volunteer. When seniors were not feeling well or in inclement weather, volunteers would shop or do an errand for them, such as pick-up/drop -off from/to a pharmacy or post office. Volunteers also picked-up seniors after medical procedures, accompanied them on walks, helped with errands (such as escorts to/from banks, reading mail, shopping, hair salons, social programs, rehabs and escorting to/from Access-A-Ride renewal application centers). Volunteers have also helped seniors with getting pets to vets. Our staff also encouraged seniors to vote, including helping seniors mail absentee ballots when they couldnt get out. Volunteers escorted seniors who wanted to vote in person and we helped seniors use/mail their absentee ballots. Volunteers also escorted seniors on longer Therapeutic Walks. As the pandemic has continued on for such a long time, it resulted in many seniors expressing to staff that they felt somewhat sad and depressed and having developed cabin fever. They have a strong need to go outside for a safe long walk accompanied by someone who could be by their side. Many seniors are afraid of walking outside alone afraid of tripping on a sidewalk, getting caught in a crosswalk, being knocked down by someone not paying attention while on a cellphone or someone stealing their purse and just fear of falling in general. Some of our more independent seniors just wanted to go outside to get a break from the confines of their apartment and felt more comfortable with someone by their side. We responded by starting a walking program which continued to grow and we also have successfully been able to engage more young volunteers (ages 14-24) to interact with our seniors by taking walks together and having meaningful discussions with them along the way. As more medical professional started seeing patients again and more procedures started to happen again, volunteers escorted seniors to and from those medical appointment and procedures. Friendly Visiting Provides the elderly clients with companion visits. Volunteers provided approximately 7,600 visits. Health Advocacy Provides support during clients hospital stays and follow up at home after hospital stay, emergency preparedness, in-home safety checks, information on free and low-cost health services, liaison between the client and health care providers, providing health education materials on a variety of health concerns and identifying risk factors and emotional support and encouragement, approximately 1400 Hours. Wellness Programs Information and activities, including Therapeutic Walks and small groups and individual discussion on a variety of health and wellness issues, to promote healthy living and wellness, approximately 4,400 contracts hours. Information and Referral Services Staff and Volunteers respond to individuals requesting information and guidance. During the year, 4,000 calls were received and responded to. Telephone Reassurance Seniors received check-in and/or Friendly Calls for Conversation to alleviate loneliness and isolation - Approximately 5,250 hours. Special Occasions provides visits, calls and mailings for birthdays and holidays to provide positive uplifting messages of hope and good cheer.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.8%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 81.7%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.9%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.8% of revenue deployed · 81.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $319K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $129K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.