Visionsservices for the Blind and Visually Impaired

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
131624210
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2126251616
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Blind/Visually Impaired Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,251,796
Expenses
$16,593,187
Assets
$148,709,556
Liabilities
$1,329,719

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

31 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT SCHONBRUNN (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE)
  • DR CYNTHIA STUEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • NANCY T JONES (PAST PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE)
  • NANCY D MILLER (ED/ CEO (UNTIL 3/31/24))
  • SYLVIA STINSON-PEREZ (ED/CEO (2/1/24-11/30/24))
  • MOLLY EAGAN (CEO (AS OF 7/14/25))

Highest reported compensation

  • NATALIA S YOUNG (COO (ACTG. ED/CEO 12/1/24-7/15/25)): $327,949 total reported compensation
  • CARLOS CABRERA (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $311,758 total reported compensation
  • RUBEN COELLAR (CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER): $282,909 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule o

What it reported doing in 2024

Community services: visions served more than 8,000 individuals (including family members, caregivers, and professional organizations we have provided education to in the community). This included more than 6,375 unduplicated individuals through community-based services, promoting independence through vision rehabilitation, assistive technology, vocational training, community engagement, and caregiver support servicescore rehabilitation services included vision rehabilitation therapy, orientation and mobility, social work counseling, low vision therapy, occupational therapy, referrals to low vision doctors, in-home and community-based instruction, youth services, work readiness, job placement, diagnostic vocational evaluations, and unpaid caregiver support services. These services helped children, youth, adults, older adults, and caregivers build practical skills, safety, confidence, and community connection.the outreach department educated or trained more than 4,600 individuals about vision loss. Outreach and services were provided in 18 languages through bi-lingual staff and part-time interpreters.blindline, intake and [email protected], received and responded to nearly 1,000 inquiries. Visions was ranked #1 in job placement of blind and visually impaired individuals in New York state for the 10th consecutive year. Visions' expansion into westchester and the lower hudson valley served 604 participants, an increase from the previous year.visions center on aging and intergenerational program: visions operates one of only two citywide innovative older adult centers in New York city dedicated to serving special populations. The program includes the first publicly funded New York city older adult center specifically designed for older adults with vision loss, serving 703 enrolled members during the year.visions is also the only New York city-funded older adult center with an approved restaurant voucher program, enabling blind older adults to enjoy a nutritious breakfast with friends at no cost at a local restaurant, helping to promote nutrition, independence, and social connection.the intergenerational program offered through the visions center on aging matches blind older adults with high school students to promote companionship, mutual learning, and community engagement across generations. The visions intergenerational program was recognized as a program of distinction by generations united.an additional program component introduced youth support for older adults in the areas of assistive technology training and assistance with applying for paid and volunteer opportunities, helping older adults strengthen digital skills, increase independence, and remain engaged in their communities.visions unpaid caregiver support program served more than 754 caregivers and their care recipients during the year. Services included in-home respite, overnight respite services at the visions center on blindness (vcb), counseling, and emergency supplies designed to support caregivers and help individuals remain safely in their homes and communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.1%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.96; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $13.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $328K · 31 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.