Vision for Equality Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232891928
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2677735281
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,344,124
Expenses
$3,349,511
Assets
$3,066,588
Liabilities
$1,335,386

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER LOGAN (PRESIDENT)
  • AUDREY COCCIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MAUREEN DEVANEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MAUREEN DEVANEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $145,974 total reported compensation
  • AUDREY COCCIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $140,237 total reported compensation
  • JILL LONG (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $109,736 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Vision for equality works each day to serve, support and empower individuals with intellectual disabilities and their families bringing to them the information and tools they need to create the life of meaning they want and to successfully navigate the complex service system that does/should serve them to achieve a full life of satisfaction in their perspective communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Vision for equality is a grass roots, non-profit organization that assists people with disabilities and their families to seek quality and satisfaction in their lives and equal access to services and supports in the community. Our consumer and family satisfaction teams, parent support groups, advocacy assistance department, waiting list campaign, independent monitoring teams, pa family network, serve as the impetus to reach thousands of people with disabilities and families yearly to bring them the knowledge and information they require to change their lives. Through referrals, technical assistance, direct support as well as training individuals and their families to gain the power and expertise to navigate a complicated service system to seek the services they need.our staff under our consumer and family satisfaction department along with our independent monitoring for quality teams monitor present services to ensure quality care and to address concerns as they arise reporting information back to the system when needed to enhance people's lives. We offer direct mentoring and support to 7 parent support groups who represent the diversity of our philadelphia community bringing them the opportunities to advance their knowledge and the stage to forward their cause and concerns back to the system for redress. Our waiting list campaign educates the system to the needs of those who wait with no services across Pennsylvania. As a result of their work alone over 15,000 people have begun to receive services for the first time. The pa family network was established to support families throughout the lifespan. The pa family network consists of a team of 18 family advisors who train families across the commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Vision has also brought the needs of the latino community to the forefront to ensure equal access for them as well. This community is often isolated and alone due to language barriers. Through our latino staff who provide advocacy, translation and interpretation services several thousand new families a year are assisted in becoming part of the service system and having love ones receive the services they desperately need.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 84% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.8%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 97.6%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1,367.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.8% of revenue deployed · 97.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $146K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.