Virginia United Methodist Homes of Williamsburg Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300173798
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Glen Allen, VA, USA
Phone
8044748700
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$25,668,071
Expenses
$25,441,842
Assets
$103,744,403
Liabilities
$131,459,614

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTOPHER P HENDERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREA M STASKIEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRISTOPHER P HENDERSON (PRESIDENT): $785,552 total reported compensation
  • ANDREA M STASKIEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $286,759 total reported compensation
  • STEVEN NELSON (DIRECTOR - BLDG AND GROUNDS): $162,503 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Enriching life's journey by providing housing, health care and related services for seniors.

What it reported doing in 2024

Windsormeade williamsburg has been providing housing, health services and financial security to residents at its life plan community in williamsburg, va since 2007. Windsormeade williamsburg was established as a cooperative effort with Virginia united methodist homes, inc., doing business as pinnacle living, a related tax-exempt organization which was founded in 1947. Pinnacle living operates four life plan communities in Virginia and two assisted living communities. In addition to windsormeade williamsburg, the communities of pinnacle living are hermitage richmond, hermitage roanoke, cedarfield, hermitage deep run, and hermitage three chopt. Together with its affiliated organization, pinnacle living, windsormeade williamsburg serves a wide range of socially and economically diverse residents through a person-centered focus on each individual's physical, emotional, recreational, social and religious needs. With a rich legacy of over seventy-five years, pinnacle living and windsormeade williamsburg have built a longstanding reputation of providing excellent, compassionate support and services in a faith-based environment. Windsormeade williamsburg provides (directly and through third party arrangements) for the health care of residents, in household and neighborhood settings with nursing services, assistance with activities of daily living, memory support, physical therapy and related health services. Windsormeade williamsburg is committed to providing for the financial security of its residents in compliance with the standards applicable to a public charity. Consistent with this commitment, windsormeade williamsburg participates in the samaritan program for benevolent care established by pinnacle living. Through the samaritan program, funds are solicited by various means, including direct solicitation of members of the united methodist church, on behalf of the residents of pinnacle living and windsormeade williamsburg who may become unable to pay the full cost of their expenses. Windsormeade williamsburg strives to establish, foster, and leverage external relationships through cooperation, coordination, and collaboration that extend the organization's mission into the broader community. Key partners in community engagement and social accountability initiatives include public and private educational institutions, other charitable organizations, hospitals, social service agencies, local governments, and faith-based communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 85
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.4%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 87.5%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.08; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.27; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.4% of revenue deployed · 87.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $786K · 12 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.