Virginia Scholastic Rowing Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521217491
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fairfax Station, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7034411648
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Swimming & Other Water Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $321,966
- Expenses
- $292,309
- Assets
- $340,990
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOROTHY LAZOR (PRESIDENT)
- SHIRLEY VON RINTELN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DOROTHY LAZOR (PRESIDENT)
- SHIRLEY VON RINTELN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANDREI BUSUIOCEANU (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote, encourage, support rowing at secondary schools in Virginia. Provide communication and coordination amongst its member teams, local organizing committee, crew council, and coaches committee. Sponsor and conduct scholastic rowing competitions. Conduct va scholastic rowing championships, yearly.
What it reported doing in 2024
Supported rowing at secondary schools in Virginia.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.9%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 94.6%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.2%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.9% of revenue deployed · 94.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 52 of 52 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $292K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 13 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX AllOtherExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.