Virginia Public Safety Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262773062
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Richmond, VA, USA
Phone
8042257152
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Reported finances

Expenses
$3,275
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VANESSA R CRAWFORD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • VANESSA R CRAWFORD (PRESIDENT)
  • KEVIN W HALL (SECRETARY)
  • FRED S CLARK (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation is organized to receive, maintain and administer assets in perpetuity exclusively for the purpose of promoting and protecting the common interest of Virginia public safety professional.

What it reported doing in 2018

Prior to december 31, 2015, the Virginia public safety alliance (vpsa) participated in lobbying activities pursuant to section 2.2-426 of the code of Virginia. The vpsa sponsored entertainment events allowed by the Virginia lobbyist disclosure act with sheriffs and members of the Virginia general assembly, consistent with the organizing representations and documents when the vpsa was established in 2009, and with the code of Virginia. All lobbying activities are reported to the secretary of the commonwealth of Virginia as required by law and to those participating in the events. The organization terminated all expenditures on lobbying activities on december 31, 2015. The organization did not register as a lobbying organization with the commonwealth of Virginia beginning in may 2016.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -53.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 1 of 1 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.