Virginia Pain Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842489886
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Henrico, VA, USA
Phone
3366678100
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$79,220
Expenses
$75,232
Assets
$20,545
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Anthony Dragovich MD (President)
  • Frederick W Brason II (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Anthony Dragovich MD (President)
  • Robert Trainer DO (Director)
  • Lynn Kohan MD (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Virginia Pain Society is an educational and charitable forum for patients and the public to promote same, effective medical care for patients in pain through patient advocacy, education, and collaboration, to support the development of both scientific and practical aspects of pain management.Virginia Pain Society's accomplishments include establishing an annual educational conference for professionals, residents, and fellows engaged in pain management. The conference provides 11.5 Certified Medical Education credits to assist the professionals in meeting their annual requirement for continuing education.

What it reported doing in 2025

Virginia Pain Society's accomplishments include establishing an annual educational conference for professionals, residents, and fellows engaged in pain management. The conference provides 11.5 Certified Medical Education credits to assist the professionals in meeting their annual requirement for continuing education. The average attendance per year is 100 individuals, and repeated attendance has accumulated over 300 professionals to receive updates, pertinent articles, and access to conference presentations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.9%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $77K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.