Virginia League of Social Services Executives Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510244911
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Front Royal, VA, USA
Phone
5406353430
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$218,826
Expenses
$225,140
Assets
$76,787
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • REBECCA MORGAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • REBECCA MORGAN (PRESIDENT)
  • LANA MULLINS (VICE PRESIDE)
  • ANDREW CRAWFORD (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To foster collegial relationships among its members by encouraging open communication, shared learning, and mutual support; and to promote meaningful collaboration among local, regional, and state agenciesas well as with federal partnersin the development, implementation, and advocacy of legislation and policies that enhance public welfare. Furthermore, to strengthen cooperation and build mutual understanding between the various levels of the department of social services, other governmental bodies, private organizations, and the communities they serve, in order to ensure coordinated, responsive, and effective delivery of human services throughout the commonwealth of Virginia.

What it reported doing in 2024

Organized and facilitated two in-depth semi-annual conferences and four strategic executive board meetings to provide ongoing education and leadership training for Virginia social services executives. These gatherings served as a platform to disseminate timely updates on federal and state policies, administrative procedures, and regulatory guidelines affecting public assistance programs such as medicaid, snap, tanf, and child care. The conferences featured presentations by policy experts, legal advisors, and experienced practitioners, offering actionable insights into compliance, program innovation, and service delivery improvement.in addition, the executive board meetings fostered high-level dialogue around governance, policy development, and strategic planning. These sessions strengthened cross-jurisdictional collaboration, promoted consistency in statewide service delivery, and supported the professional growth of agency leadership. Through knowledge-sharing, case studies, and scenario-based planning, participants were better prepared to lead their organizations with integrity, adapt to policy shifts, and meet the evolving needs of virginias diverse communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.9%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.7% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 135 of 6 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $198K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.