Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930717997
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Aloha, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5033598508
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $110,530,257
- Expenses
- $103,727,396
- Assets
- $164,624,283
- Liabilities
- $38,970,290
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GILLES MUNOZ (CEO)
- STEFANNY CABALLERO (FOUNDATION EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LAURA BYERLY (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $344,492 total reported compensation
- GEOFFREY CARDEN (MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF PROVIDER AFFAIRS): $341,825 total reported compensation
- GILLES MUNOZ (CEO): $330,947 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Virginia garcia memorial health center is to provide high quality, comprehensive, and culturally appropriate primary health care to the communities of Washington and yamhill counties (see schedule o for continuation)with a special emphasis on migrant and seasonal farmworkers and others with barriers to receiving health care.
What it reported doing in 2024
Founded in 1975, Virginia garcia memorial health center (the center) is a nonprofit organization that provides high quality, comprehensive, and culturally appropriate primary health care to the Oregon communities of Washington and yamhill counties with a special emphasis on migrant and seasonal farmworkers and others with barriers to receiving healthcare.the center started as a single clinic in cornelius, Oregon. Today, it is a community health center with five primary care clinics, a reproductive health clinic, six dental clinics, five school-based health centers, patient reengagement clinic, and three mobile clinics, serving more than 52,000 patients who speak more than 70 languages. The center offers medical, dental, pharmacy, behavioral health, wellness, and outreach services. About 98 percent of its patients have low-incomes, 25 percent are uninsured, 38 percent are children, and 54 percent are latine.the center's dental providers visit schools to screen children for dental problems and apply sealants to keep cavities at bay. Community health workers and providers visit migrant camps and commercial nurseries each summer with the mobile clinic to offer medical and dental services and to donate supplies. The center also offers group education, such as healthy cooking classes, diabetes management, and fitness classes to help patients achieve health and wellness.the center constantly looks for new and innovative ways to improve its services and increase access for patients. Examples of this are the recently completed expansion of the newberg wellness center and the opening of a new primary care clinic in rural sheridan, Oregon, in september 2025. Both of these sites aim to expand patient access to an array of health care services, including medical and dental care, behavioral health, and pharmacy. Additionally, the center is expanding its mobile health program to increase access to rural communities, shelters, and other priority populations in Washington and yamhill counties.with the shortage of healthcare workers affecting clinics across the nation, the center developed its own workforce development program, covering tuition for medical and dental assistant training and hiring those who complete their certifications, most of whom are bilingual and bicultural. The center is partnering with local school districts and community colleges to create pathways into healthcare careers for medical assistants, dental assistants, pharmacy technicians, and registered nurses. Center revenues are generated through patient care service fees, grants from the u.s. Department of health and human services and other government agencies, private grants, and individual and corporate donations. The center has the status of a federally qualified health center (fqhc). This designation provides the center with enhanced medicare and medicaid reimbursements and health resources and service administration (hrsa) section 330 grants that enable the center to bill patients on a sliding scale based on their income.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.8%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 71.1%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.8% of revenue deployed · 71.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $73.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $344K · 30 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.9M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.